Kunal Yadav @ Santosh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52437 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2017 Thana -KAKO District- JEHANABAD ======================================================
1. Kunal Yadav @ Santosh Kumar S/o Kapildeo Narayan Singh, R/o Village- Makhdumpur Ahara, P.S.- Kako , District- Jehanabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Kako P.S. Case No. 47/2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged against the petitioner that he assaulted on the head of Baliram Yadav with Garasa. Injury report of Baliram Yadav is annexed as Annexure-3, wherein it is mentioned that one lacerated wound on the left parietal region has been found, which is caused by hard blunt substance.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Kako P.S. Case No. 47/2017,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52437 of 2017 (2) dt.09-11-2017 2/2 he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IV, Jehanabad, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T