Vijay Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50924 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -243 Year- 2017 Thana -HARNAUT District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Vijay Yadav

2. Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Harnaut P.S. Case No. 243 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-307 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code.

There is specific allegation of firing against co-accused Manoj Yadav. Petitioners are named in the written report but there is no specific allegation of overt act against these petitioners. In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Harnaut P.S. Case No. 243 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Bihar Sharif subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50924 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T