← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46757/2025bail rejected

Md. Rehan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-12-12Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46757 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2024 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Md. Rehan S/o- Md. Sakeel Village- Baji Bigha PS-Guraru Distt- Gaya ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Asgari Khatoon D/o- Ashmuddin R/o- Dhanghwan Ps- Mufassil, DistAurangabad ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms/Mrs. Sangeeta Sharma, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 504, 376 of the IPC and sections 3⁄4 of the DP Act.

3. As per prosecution case, petitioner took the informant to Mumbai and there he kept her in a room and made physical relation for 1.5 months on the false promise of marriage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is relative of informant and from perusal of the FIR, it appears that there, was love affair between the parties. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and he is in custody since 23.4.2025.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits that victim, in her statement recorded under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, has specifically alleged that this petitioner took the informant to Mumbai and forcibly made physical relation with her as a result of which she became pregnant.

6. Considering the gravity of accusation as well as the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46757 of 2025(3) dt.12-12-2025 2/2 materials collected during course of investigation, petition for bail of this petitioner is dismissed. Since, petitioner is in custody, let the trial be expedited and concluded preferably within a year.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T