Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9135/2016rejected

Ramjee Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9135 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -186 Year- 2015 Thana -MARHAURA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Ramjee Manjhi Son of Sri Krishna Manjhi Resident of VillageDeobahuara, P.S. Marhowrah, District Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Narayan Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. G.S.Gupta(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence punishable under section 302 of the I.P.C Allegedly, the petitioner was demanding Rs. 500/- from his mother Sonali Devi and due to non fulfillment the petitioner stabbed her to death.

Submission is of false implication and that there was no intention to commit murder, the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is suffering in custody since 20.07.2015, the petitioner is a handicapped man, as a matter of fact the mother of the petitioner fell on the brick and sharp object such as glass which entered into her chest.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9135 of 2016 (3) dt.26-04-2016 2/2 The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering the allegation attributed against the petitioner, serious in nature, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his such prayer stands rejected in connection with S. Tr. No. 660 of 2015 arising out of Marhowrah P.S. Case No. 186 of 2015 pending in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge- III, Saran at Chapra.

However, considering detention of the petitioner, let the trial be expedited and concluded preferably within a period of nine months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T