Patna High CourtL.P.A/879/2014dismissed

Mrs Sanjharia v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-03-24Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.879 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16619 of 2011 =========================================================== Mrs Sanjharia, W/O late Jalim Ram, Resident of village + P.O.- Nonhar, P.S.- Surajpura, Distt- Rohtas .... .... Appellants

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Petroleum Oil and Natural Gas, Mumbai

2. The Secretary, Department of Petroleum Oil and Natural Gas, Mumbai

3. The Senior Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Having regional office, Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, 6th Floor, post Box: 40, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna- 1

4. The Deputy General Manager, North Central Zone Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited having regional office Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, 6th Floor, post Box: 40, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna- 1

5. The Senior Regional Manager, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Bhawan, 6th Floor, post Box: 40, Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna- 1 .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant : Mr. Naresh Kr. Malhotra, Sr. Advocate Mr. Binod Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the HPCL : Mr. Rajeev Prakash, Advocate For the UOI : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 24-03-2017 Heard Senior Counsel for the appellant and counsel for the Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

The submission of the leaned Senior Counsel for the appellant that the reason for rejection of her claim that she was not literate is misplaced because under the defence category education qualification is not required.

Patna High Court LPA No.879 of 2014 dt.24-03-2017 2/2 The fact is that the advertisement related to the year 2010. Seven years have gone past. Since then many things have undergone a change which include the modality of selection. The location and allocation within the industry all have changed after the advertisement itself was cancelled and the site withdrawn by the Company.

No interference is warranted with the order dated 12.12.2013. Appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 28.03.2017 Transmission Date NA