Deenmani Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50215 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2018 Thana- KHAGARIA District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.
DEENMANI YADAV Son of Narayan Yadav Resident of Village - Chandra Nagar (Ranko), P.S.- Muffasil, District - Khagaria. 2.
Narayan Yadav Son of Late Bishundeo Yadav Resident of Village - Chandra Nagar (Ranko), P.S.- Muffasil, District - Khagaria. 3.
Rahul Kumar @ Chhotu Son of Chandrika Prasad Resident of Village - Chandra Nagar (Ranko), P.S.- Muffasil, District - Khagaria. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP Fro the Informant : Dr. Amrendra Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2019 This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 280 of 2018, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners and the petitioners were earlier on police bail and they have not misused the said privilege.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50215 of 2019(2) dt.13-08-2019 2/2 Heard learned APP as well as learned counsel for the informant.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner rather petitioner may surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail and if any such application is filed, the court below will dispose of the same after considering the submission that petitioners were earlier on police bail and they have not misused the said privilege, if possible on same day, without being prejudiced by this order.
This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T