Vijay Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48660 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-242 Year-2024 Thana- PANDARAK District- Patna ====================================================== Vijay Yadav S/O Singeshwar Yadav R/O Vill.- Dargahi Tola, P.S.- Pandarak, Dist.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bhim Sen Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad- A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 109, 3(5), of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons intercepted his brother who was coming back home after selling milk and Vijay (petitioner) assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on head. On alarm, the informant reached the place of occurrence and tried to intervene when the accused persons also assaulted him and his other brother Dilip by rod causing fracture of finger.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48660 of 2025(3) dt.24-09-2025 2/3

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that from the side of the petitioner also Pandarak P. S. Case No.243 of 2024 has been instituted against the side of the informant and others. It is next submitted that on account of dispute relating to land, an altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is also submitted that doctor has opined the injury to be simple.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application, but then, submits that the Medical Officer Incharge, Primary Health Centre, Pandarak had recorded that the injury may be simple.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-1st, Barh, Patna in connection with Pandarak P. S. Case No.242 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48660 of 2025(3) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T