Bikram Yadav @ Vikram Yadav @ Vikram Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48244 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2021 Thana- PANDAUL District- Madhubani ====================================================== BIKRAM YADAV @ VIKRAM YADAV @ VIKRAM KUMAR SINGH S/o Bhola Yadav Resident of Village- Sagarpur, P.S.- Sakri, District- Madhubani, at present Village and P.S.- Pandaul, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bhaskar Shankar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pushpa Sinha.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 30(a), 36, 38 and 41(1) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Allegation is of recovery of 2104.5 litres of liquor from a truck, pickup and two Scorpio from Bada village. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has antecedents of six cases and in all the cases petitioner has been implicated in the manner as he has been implicated in the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48244 of 2022(2) dt.13-09-2022 2/2 was recovered from his conscious possession, further the petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of any of the vehicles and he came to be implicated because of his antecedents and on the basis of secret information. Learned counsel further submits that once a person is made an accused in a case under the Excise Act, the police starts implicating him falsely as as has been done in the present case. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Pandaul P.S. Case No. 205 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T