← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10885/2024disposed

Ramratan Sada v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-23Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10885 of 2024 ====================================================== Ramratan Sada Son of Manmohan Sada, Resident of Village - Aurahi, P.S. - Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Princial Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

4.

The Circle Officer, Block - Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga. 5.

The Halka Karamchari, Block - Kusheshwar Asthan, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Addl. Advocate General-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-07-2024 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned Advocate for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks a direction upon the respondents to create Jamabandi i.e. Dakhil-Kharij in name of the petitioner for the land ceiling percha in relation to a land situated in Mouza-Aurahi, Thana No. 201, Anchal-Kusheshwar Asthan, District-Darbhanga pertaining to Khata No. 123, Khesra No. 301, Area-1Acre.

3. The grievance of the petitioner in a narrow compass is that despite his application pending for the last six years, the same could not be disposed of.

Patna High Court CWJC No.10885 of 2024(2) dt.23-07-2024 2/2

4. Considering the limited grievance of the petitioner, this Court deems it apt to dispose of the writ petition with a direction to the Circle Officer to consider the claim of the petitioner and pass a final order.

5. To facilitate the remedy, if the petitioner files a fresh application alongwith the document in support of his claim, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the respondent no. 4, preferably within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (Harish Kumar, J) supratim/- U