Ravi Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46477 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-522 Year-2025 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Yadav Son of Sonalal Prasad @ Sonalal Yadav Resident of Village - Sounaha, P.S. - Palanwa, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-07-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 522 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that unknown accused stole the informant's Hero Glamour motorcycle from outside Dr. Shaista Pravin's clinic at Raxaul.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused Jahir Alam which has no evidentiary value in the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46477 of 2026(2) dt.20-07-2026 2/2 eye of law. Learned counsel further submitted that the stolen motorcycle is alleged to have been recovered from the petitioner but, as a matter of fact, the petitioner purchased the said motorcycle from co-accused Jahir Alam. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 16.01.2026 and has three criminal antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Raxaul P.S. Case No. 522 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T