Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10374/2016bail granted

Shatrudhan Paswan @ Satrughan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-27Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.10374 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2015 Thana -BEERPUR District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== SHATRUDHAN PASWAN @ SATRUGHAN PASWAN Son of Gulo Paswan, resident of Village- Pakri Jagir Tola, P.S. Birpur, DistrictBegusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lallan Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-04-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 376 and 511of the I.P.C Allegedly, the petitioner tried to commit rape with the informant and on protest assaulted her with Sugar cane but due to alarm being raised the nearby persons came and caught the petitioner.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is a poor labour, some altercation took place between the informant and the petitioner and then she lodged this false case resulting the petitioner is suffering in custody since 22.08.2015. The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail by

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10374 of 2016 (3) dt.27-04-2016 2/2 submitting that on the person of the informant injuries caused by the hard and blunt substance have been found. In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering detention of the petitioner, now he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Begusarai in Sessions Trial No. 33 of 2016 arising out of Birpur P.S. Case No. 62 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T