Rajeshwar Das v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.63084 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1033 Year- 2011 Thana -MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Rajeshwar Das, Son of Anup Lal Das, Resident of Village- Rajni, Bathnaha, P.S. Murliganj, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Indu Devi, W/o Rajeshwar Das, Resident of Village- Rajni Tola, Bathnaha, P.S. Murliganj, District- Madhepura. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rana Pratap Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Chandrasen Prasad Singh, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 498(A) of the IPC.

The prosecution story, in brief, is that the accused persons including the petitioner tortured the victim due to nonfulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63084 of 2017 (2) dt.04-01-2018 2/2 witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M. Madhepura, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1033 of 2011, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T