Tabassum Praveen Rimmi @ Tabassun Praveen v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.48652 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -34 Year- 2017 Thana -RASULPUR District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Tabassum Praveen ( Rimmi) @ Tabassun Praveen W/o Md. Idrish Miyan r/o mohalla- Mirchaya Tola, Mahina Nagar, P.S.- Bhagwan Bazar, Distt.- Saran .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ram Sumiran Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections-366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the victim girl in her statement u/S 164 of the Cr.P.C. has stated that she was taken to Mumbai and Patna by Irfan and he was forcing her to perform marriage. This petitioner is mother of said Irfan. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner in the written report and statement of victim girl u/S 164 of the Cr.P.C.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48652 of 2017 (5) dt.24-11-2017 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 34 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-X, Saran at Chapra subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T