Shankar Rai And ORS v. Most. Parbati Kuer And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Second Appeal No.300 of 2009 ======================================================

1. Shankar Rai

2. Babu Rai

3. Bharat Rai

4. Butai Rai, all sons of Garib Rai

5. Naresh Rai

6. Suresh Rai, both sons of Shankar Rai

7. Nawal Rai

8. Mahesh Rai, both sons of Basu Rai

9. Sanjay Rai

10. Sona Rai @ Sonalal Rai, both sons of Bharat Rai

11. Rooplal Rai, minor son of Bharat Rai (under the guardianship of his father Bharat Rai)

12. Vira Rai, son of Butai Rai, All residents of Village Mahrani Bahjawal, Post Damodarpur, P.S. Pipra, District East Champaran .......... Defendants lst set ...... Respondents lst set .... .... Appellants

Versus

1(a). Most. Parbati Kuer, wife of Late Ram Bahadur Rai 1(b). Mina Devi, 1©. Manju Devi, both daughters of Late Ram Bahadur Rai

2. Deo Narain Rai, son of Hari Rai

3. Kameshwar Rai

4. Rabindra Rai, both sons of Ram Bahadur Rai

5. Jagdish Rai, son of Deo Narain Rai, all residents of Village Mahrani Mahwal, Post Damodarpur, P.S. Pipra, District East Champaran .... Plaintiffs ...... Appellants

6. Jagdish Prasad, son of Mangal Prasad resident of Village Pipra, P.S. Pipra, District East Champaran

7. Jagdeo Rai, son of Ramautar Rai,

8. Jinilal Rai, son of Raj Kumar Rai, both residents of Village Mahrani, Post Damodarpur, P.S. Pipra, District East Champaran .......... Defendants 2nd set ......... Respondent 2nd set .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Rajesh Ranjan-1 Mr. Shakti Suman Kumar Mr. Uma Kant Shukla For the Respondent/s : Mr. Null ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 10-12-2015 Learned Counsel for the appellants, respondent Nos. 2, 5, 6, 7 8 and the learned Counsel appearing for the remaining

Patna High Court SA No.300 of 2009 (13) dt.10-12-2015 respondents have jointly stated that the parties have settled their dispute and entered into a compromise. The terms of the compromise has been incorporated in the Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. 7077 of 2015). Learned Counsel for the parties have prayed that this appeal be disposed of in terms of the aforesaid compromise.

After hearing the learned Counsel for the parties, this appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise as incorporated in the Interlocutory Application (I.A. No. 7077 of 2015) which shall form part of the decree.

(V. Nath, J.) Snkumar/- U