Dinanath Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.62847 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1218 Year- 2002 Thana -MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictMADHUBANI ====================================================== Dinanath Singh, son of Late Markandey Singh, Agent Vishwakarma Agro Agency, Pandaul, Resident of Village- Audha, Police Station- Pandaul, District- Madhubani.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Sabbir Ahmad, Son of Late Abdul Sakoor, resident of Village- Khrra, P.S.- Town Madhubani, District- Madhubani.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-04-2018 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The present case appears to have been settled amongst the parties as has been stated both by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the informant especially on account of the fact that the amount said to have been misappropriated by the petitioner herein has been returned back. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioner herein to the privilege of anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order on furnishing bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62847 of 2017 (4) dt.05-04-2018 2/2 bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Madhubani in connection with C.R. Case No. 1218 of 2002, corresponding to T.R. No. 1654 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
It is directed that the records be returned back to the concerned court.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U T