← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45915/2025allowed

Kailu Uraw @ Kailu Uranw v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-04Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45915 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-401 Year-2024 Thana- CHHATAPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== Kailu Uraw @ Kailu Uranw S/o Ram Khelawan Uranw Resident of VillageChunni Ward No. 11, P.S.- Chhatapur, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with S.T. Excise Case No. 1207 of 2024 arising out of Chhatapur P.S. Case no. 401 of 2024 instituted for the offence under Section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the police had got secret information that two persons are carrying illicit liquor. When the police reached the place of occurrence, two persons fled away after throwing the gallons which they were holding in their hand. It is further alleged that from that gallans, 20 liters of country made liquor was recovered. The name of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45915 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 2/3 was disclosed by the villagers.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner rather the same has been recovered from bush. The name of the petitioner has been disclosed by the villagers. Further submission is that the petitioner is having no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with S.T. Excise Case No. 1207 of 2024 arising out of Chhatapur P.S. Case no. 401 of 2024, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excis Court No. 1, Supaul, subject to the conditions as laid down under section

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45915 of 2025(2) dt.04-08-2025 3/3 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/ Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Jagdish/- U T