Kunal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.58796 of 2017 ======================================================
1. Kunal Kumar, Son of Ramashray Singh, resident of Village- Kumkar Tola, Barun, P.S. Barun, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nityanand ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in Barun P.S. Case No. 148 of 2014 instituted for the offence under Sections-302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.
It has been submitted that police after investigation, submitted Final Form against this petitioner. This petitioner has been summoned to face trial u/S 319 Cr.P.C. during trial of S.Tr. No. 50 of 2015/532 of 2017.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner named above in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Barun P.S. Case No. 148 of 2014 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58796 of 2017 (2) dt.13-12-2017 2/2 Magistrate, Aurangabad subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T