Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20713/2015bail granted

Vishwanath Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2015-05-06Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20713 of 2015 (2) dt.06-05-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20713 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -127 Year- 2013 Thana -SAHPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Vishwanath Rai, S/o Late Ramashish Rai, R/o Village - Sinohi tola,P.S. - Naubatpur, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Nandan Pandit, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Binod Kumar-2 (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 06-05-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.

The learned counsel for the petitioner wants to renew prayer for bail of the petitioner which has already been rejected by order dated 16.07.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 18182 of 2014 on the ground that the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer for bail after remaining in custody for a period of 11⁄2 years and this petitioner remaining in custody since 10.09.2013 has already suffered that period. It is also submitted that fatal blow was given by Rahish Rai and not by this petitioner and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration.

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering the period of detention of the petitioner now the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20713 of 2015 (2) dt.06-05-2015 petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of A.D.J-2, Danapur in S. Tr. No. 922 of 2014 arising out of Shahpur P.S. Case No. 127 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T