Prithviraj Yaduvanshi v. B. N. Mandal University And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.453 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18338 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Prithviraj Yaduvanshi Son of Sri Ram Sagar Prasad Yadav resident of Ward No. 01, B.N. Mandal University Campus, Quarter No. 103, P.S. & District - Madhepura .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. B. N. Mandal University, Madhepura through its Registrar

2. The Vice Chancellor, B. N. Mandal University, Madhepura

3. The Registrar, B. N. Mandal University, Madhepura .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== WITH Letters Patent Appeal No.473 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15519 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Prithviraj Yaduvanshi, son of Sri Ram Sagar Prasad Yadav, Resident of Ward No. 1, B.N Mandal University Campus, Quarter No. 103, P.S. & District- Madhepura.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. B. N. Mandal University, Madhepura through its Registrar.

2. The Vice Chancellor, B. N. Mandal University, Madhepura.

3. The Registrar, B. N. Mandal University, Madhepura. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In LPA No.453 of 2016) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Singh, Advocate (In LPA No.473 of 2016) For the Appellant/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rajesh Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 30-03-2016 Heard Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant, and Mr. Rajesh Singh, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of B.N. Mandal University in both these appeals.

It has been correctly pointed out by Mr. Binod Kumar

Patna High Court LPA No.453 of 2016 (7) dt.30-03-2016 2/2 Sinha, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the appellant, that the order, dated 16.03.2016, passed in LPA No.473 of 2016, has incorrectly been recorded in LPA No.453 of 2016, and similarly the order, dated 16.03.2016, passed in LPA No.453 of 2016 has wrongly been recorded in LPA No.473 of 2016.

To the submissions so made, no objection has been raised on behalf of the respondents.

Considering, therefore, the matter in its entirety and in the interest of justice, it is hereby directed that the order, dated 16.03.2016, passed in LPA No.473 of 2016, shall henceforth be read as the order, passed in LPA No.453 of 2016, and similarly, the order, passed on 16.03.2016, in LPA No.453 of 2016, shall henceforth be read as the order in LPA No.473 of 20116. It is further directed that in the order, dated 16.03.2016, passed in LPA No.453 of 2016, the expression "respondent No.2, namely, the Vice-Chancellor", shall stand corrected and be henceforth read as "Chancellor". It is also directed that in the order, dated 16.03.2016, passed in LPA No.473 of 2016, the expression "C.W.J.C. No.15519 of 2015", shall stand corrected and be henceforth read as "C.W.J.C. No.18338 of 2015".

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Anjana Mishra, J) Mkr./- U