Neha Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48340 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2025 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Neha Devi W/o Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Kumar Singh Resident of village- Mahula, P.S- Chainpur, District- Kaimur at Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 103(1), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman and the informant alleges that on account of dispute her daughter in-law (Puja) went to her parental home and after sometimes, came back to her matrimonial home and threatened that her family members are coming to teach them a lesson. Further, accused persons along with the petitioner came and petitioner along with Binod assaulted the husband of the informant by bamboo causing injury on head. Thereafter, Puja and Indrashan Devi assaulted the informant causing injury on head while Nachku, Rahul and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48340 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 Chhotu assaulted her son also named Sandeep causing fracture of hand.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case being sister of Puja. It is next submitted that no specific allegation of assault is alleged against the petitioner.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on her furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-Vth, Bhabhua, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Chainpur P. S. Case No.80 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T