Pintu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8217 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -5 Year- 2014 Thana -AMAS District- GAYA ====================================================== Pintu Yadav, son of Jethan Yadav, R/O Village- Kurasin, P.S.- Amas, District- Gaya .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Murari Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mukesh Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 22-04-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304A/34 of the Indian Penal Code. According to the written report made by the father of the deceased, his daughter Rina Devi (deceased) was living in her marital home but her father-in-law and sister-in-law (Gotini) used to quarrel with her. He received information that his daughter was lying in a hospital and her treatment was going on. During treatment, she succumbed to the injury. It has been alleged that she was tortured and due to which, the deceased took poison causing her death. It is submitted that there is no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner. The allegation of quarrel is in between the deceased and father-in-law and Gotini of the deceased and in the last portion, only suspicion has been raised against the petitioner and others.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8217 of 2015 (3) dt.22-04-2015 2/2 However, after investigation, charge sheet has already been submitted. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya/court concerned in Amas P.S. Case No.5 of 2014 after framing of charge with the following conditions :

1.

One of the bailors will be the close relative of the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner will not indulge in similar or in any other offence.

3.

The petitioner will be well represented in the court.

4.

In case of absence for two consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, his bail bond will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) V.K. Pandey/- U T