Dablu Choudhary @ Jayant Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47576 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2024 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Dablu Choudhary @ Jayant Choudhary S/o Late Jay Prakash Choudhary @ Late Prakash Choudhary Resident of Vill- Rampur, P.S.- Amarpur, DisttBanka ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The state of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188, 341, 323, 307, 332, 333, 353, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that a tractor loaded with sand was apprehended and the driver fled. Further, 15-20 accused came started pelting stones causing injury to a Constable and the accused fled with the tractor.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that name of the petitioner was included in the FIR based on the disclosure made by the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47576 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 Chaukidar. It is also submitted that the occurrence was videographed and it is alleged that petitioner was seen in the video. It is next submitted that petitioner is resident of a nearby place where the occurrence took place, as such, out of inquisitiveness, he also came at the place of occurrence to witness the occurrence when he came to be implicated, when admittedly petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Amarpur P. S. Case No.127 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T