Geeta Devi @ Kahli Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.54436 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -74 Year- 2016 Thana -JAGDIHSPUR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Geeta Devi @ Kahli Devi W/o Sri Lal Jee Singh, R/o Village- Harnahi, Mithu Tola, P.S.- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramanuj Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends arrest in G.R. No. 1602 of 2016 arising out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 74 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 341,342,323,307/34 and subsequently added 302/34 of the IPC .

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is not named in the written report. The learned Sessions Judge, Bhojpur, Ara mentioned in the impugned order that the name of the petitioner has surfaced during investigation in the statement of the witnesses. He further submits that the petitioner is a lady and has a clean antecedent.

In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner, named above, in the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.54436 of 2017 (2) dt.14-11-2017 2/2 event of her arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount in connection with G.R. No. 1602 of 2016 arising out of Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 74 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara subject to condition as laid down u/S 438 (2) of the Cr. P.C.

with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bonds of the petitioner and (3) if the petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.