Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55418/2017bail granted

Rajendra Choudhary And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-12-19Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55418 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2017 Thana -BIKRAMGANJ District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Rajendra Choudhary S/o Late Chaturi Choudhary

2. Urmila Devi, W/o Sri Rajendra Choudhary Both Resident of VillageMani, P.S. Bikramganj, Districct-Rohtas. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Aditya Narayan Singh 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case No.130 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the statement of victim girl on the recovery has been recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. wherein she has stated that she had love affair with Rohit Kumar. These petitioners are parents of Rohit Kumar. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, namely above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Bikramganj P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55418 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 No.130 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Bikramganj, Rohtas, subject to the conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) N.H./- U T