Santosh Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59761 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -161 Year- 2017 Thana -RAFIGANJ District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Santosh Paswan, Son of Shiv Kumar Paswan, resident of Village- Bijuliya, P.S. Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Atul Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No.161 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the written report, there is specific allegation against Ashok Paswan of assaulting the informant. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner in the written report. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, namely above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59761 of 2017 (2) dt.19-12-2017 2/2 six weeks from today, in connection with Rafiganj P.S. Case No.161 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, subject to the conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) N.H./- U T