Rupesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44781 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2018 Thana- RASULPUR District- Saran ====================================================== RUPESH YADAV S/o Kanhaiya Yadav R/o village- Ashahani, P.S.- Rasulpur, District- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 18-09-2019 Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2018, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506, 447 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that while the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail was rejected by this Court vide order dated 10.1.2019 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 70882 of 2018, this Court had granted liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months.

This Court finds that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the connected criminal case and therefore, this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44781 of 2019(3) dt.18-09-2019 2/2 Court is of the opinion that the custody of the petitioner is no longer required for interrogation.

The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is languishing in custody since 19.8.2018 and he is having a clean antecedent.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that the petitioner is having a clean antecedent and some injuries inflicted upon Subhash Yadav are attributable to the petitioner, however, the same are not very grievous as also the fact that this Court had granted liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after six months, I deem it fit and proper to enlarge the petitioner on regular bail. Accordingly, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, Chapra in connection with Rasulpur P.S. Case No. 105 of 2018. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ajay gupta/- U T