← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58312/2021bail granted

Muneshwar Paswan @ Bhuneshwar Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-07Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58312 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2019 Thana- PIRI BAZAR District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== MUNESHWAR PASWAN @ BHUNESHWAR PASWAN S/o Late Sahdeo Paswan R/o village- Lakshmipur, P.S.- Bariyarpur, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha, learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Piri Bazar P.S. Case No. 138 of 2019 instituted for the offences under Sections 364, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 16, 17 and 20 of the U.A.P. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2020, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and has antecedent of two cases and the informant alleges that he received information that Mohan Singh @ Madan Singh was abducted by the Moist, accordingly, the informant reached the house of the victim and the family member confirmed that victim was abducted by the Moist. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58312 of 2021(2) dt.07-03-2022 2/3 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, if Mohan Singh @ Madan Singh would have been abducted by the Moist then definitely his family members would have approached the police, but it was the police who alleges that on coming to know that the victim has been abducted confirmed the same from his family members. It is further submitted that the victim was released and his statement recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C, wherein he has stated that he was abducted by Nauxal but later released. Learned counsel for the petitioner thus, submits that in order to falsely implicate the petitioner, the entire allegation was cooked up by the police. It is further submitted that co-accused, Mohan Mandal has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 16.07.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21978 of 2021.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2020, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and co-accused has been granted bail and also the victim has not alleged that any extortion amount was taken, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58312 of 2021(2) dt.07-03-2022 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned SDJM, Lakhisarai in connection with Piri Bazar P.S. Case No. 138 of 2021. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Jagdish/- U T