Patna High CourtCR. WJC/154/2014dismissed

Surendra Prasad @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Home Police Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2015-01-19Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.154 of 2014 ====================================================== Surendra Prasad @ Sunil Kumar, Son of Late Ram Chandra Sah, Resident of Mohalla-Salempur, Gola Road, P.S.-Barh, District-Patna .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home (Police) Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Inspector General of Police, Patna Zone.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Central Range, Patna.

5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna. .... .... Respondents-1st Set

6. The Superintendent of Police (Rural), Patna.

7. Sri Raj Kishore Singh, the then Sub Divisional Police Officer, Barh, Dist.-Patna.

8. Sri Murli Manohar Manjhi, the then Station House Officer, Barh, P.S. and District-Patna.

9. Sri Sidhnath Singh, Circle Officer, Barh, District-Patna.

10. Mr. Nikhil Poddar, S/o Binod Kumar Poddar, P-200, Jagannath Ghat, Cross Road, P.S.-Posta, Kolkata.

11. Sri Harish Kumar Gupta, S/o late Shyam Sunder Gupta, Proprietor, Bharat Convincing Company, 36B, Akash Ganga Building, 3rd floor, 31 Maharshi Devendra Road, Room No. 705, P.S.-Posta, Kolkata. ...... .... Respondents-2nd Set.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Yash Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Nivedita Nirvikar, GA-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 19-01-2015 The present application filed under Articles 226 and

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.154 of 2014 (3) dt.19-01-2015 2 / 2 227 of the Constitution of India involves several disputed questions of fact which cannot be satisfactorily gone into or adjudicated in a writ petition.

In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to entertain the present application. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T