← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46825/2019disposed

Md. Farook v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-31Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46825 of 2019 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79720 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-811 Year-2018 Thana- SITAMARHI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

MD. FAROOK Son of Md. Sahid R/o Village- Murlichak, Ward No. 3, P.S. and District- Sitamarhi.

2.

Md. Meraj @ Md. Mustafa Son of Md. Farook R/o Village- Murlichak, Ward No. 3, P.S. and District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2019 By way of present modification, the petitioners seek to modify the order dated 20.02.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 79720 of 2018, by which, they were granted the privilege of anticipatory bail with direction to surrender in the court below within a period of six weeks.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that for the same set of occurrence, two cases has been filed by the same informant and in both the cases, the petitioner no. 1 has been granted the privilege of anticipatory bail, however, in one case he has already furnished the bail bonds however, in the present case the petitioners could not surrender in the court below within the time prescribed by the court due to some

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46825 of 2019(2) dt.31-07-2019 2/2 difficulty.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to interfere with the order dated 20.02.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 79720 of 2018. However, if the petitioners surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail, and the court below after considering the fact that petitioners were earlier granted the privilege of anticipatory bail but they could not surrender due to some difficulty, shall dispose of the prayer for regular bail of the petitioners, if possible on same day.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunilkumar/- U T