← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58323/2021bail rejected

Rakesh Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2022-06-22Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58323 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2020 Thana- BARUN District- Aurangabad ====================================================== RAKESH PANDEY Son of Anugrah Pandey Resident of Village - Paharpur, P.s.- Barun, Distt.- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of commission of murder of the informant's son by the accused persons including the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner has got clean antecedent and no eye witness to the alleged occurrence.

Learned APP appearing for the State on the basis of the case diary has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and submitted that there is much circumstance that the call was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58323 of 2021(4) dt.22-06-2022 2/2 made by this petitioner shown before this occurrence and from perusal of the case diary at para-27, it appears that on 30.05.2021 at about 20.13 hours and 20.16 hours respectively petitioner through his mobile bearing no.8521531636 had contacted the deceased on his mobile having no.7070367233 and the postmortem report also shows that the death was not in natural.

After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T