Dharmendra Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.12466 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2012 Thana -BAKHTIYARPUR District- PATNA ====================================================== Dharmendra Das, Son of Late Ram Chandra Das alias Barku Das Resident of village - Teka Bigha, P.S. - Bakhtiarpur, Dist - Patna. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey For the Opposite Party : Mr. Dashrath Mehta, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA JKUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-03-2016 Heard Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Bakhtiyarpur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2012 corresponding to Special Case no. 10 of 2012 registered under Section 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the prayer of bail of the petitioner had been rejected on 22.07.2015 with direction to the trial Court to conclude the trial within a period of six months by taking all possible steps. If the trial would not conclude within the aforesaid period, petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. Further submission is that only one witness i.e. informant has been examined, out of 08 prosecution witnesses on 15.09.2015, while
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12466 of 2016 (3) dt.30-03-2016 2/2 the charge has been framed on 12.10.2012. The petitioner is in custody since 02.04.2012.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-VIth-cum-Special Judge, Patna in connection with Bakhtiarpur P.S. Case No. 90 of 2012 (Special Case No. 10 of 2012). Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner and also on furnishing the correct address of the petitioner in case of change of the address.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) manish/- U T