Ram Lakhan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Excise, Government Of Bihar, Patna An

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1161 of 2018 ====================================================== Ram Lakhan Kumar, Son of Kishun Yadav, Resident of Village- Dhorha, P.S.- Dhamaul, District- Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

4. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga.

5. The District Magistrate, Madhubani, District- Madhubani.

6. The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani, District- Madhubani.

7. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Madhubani, District- Madhubani.

8. The Police-in-Charge of Sakari Police Station, District- Madhubani.

9. The Investigation Officer of Sakari P.S. Case No.-113 of 2017, Sakari Police Station, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha (GA1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 09-05-2018 The petitioner is a resident of the district of Nawada whereas he is required to furnish the sureties in the district of Madhubani before the District Magistrate, Madhubani, one of the conditions provided in the order dated 4.5.2018 is the deposit of original title deeds of immovable property lying within the jurisdiction of the authority concerned, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at the time of disposal of the writ application, it was pointed out to this Court that the condition to

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1161 of 2018 (3) dt.09-05-2018 2/2 deposit the original title deeds of immovable property be made applicable saying that the immovable property lying within the State of Bihar may be allowed to be placed as security, however, in the order typed on 4.5.2018, this fact could not be taken note of. Learned counsel for the State is present.

Having noticed the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the condition in so far as it states "original title deeds of immovable property lying within the jurisdiction of the authority concerned" be read as "original title deeds of immovable property lying within the jurisdiction of the State of Bihar.

The aforesaid correction will be read in the order dated 4.5.2018.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) N.H./- U T