Ajit Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48262 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2022 Thana- PIRO District- Bhojpur ====================================================== AJIT SINGH Son of Late Chandeshwar Singh R/V- Pachma, P.S- Piro, DistBhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .. ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State through video-conferencing. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 302 and120B read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the informant along with his uncle Birendra Singh visited his field for watching the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48262 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2022 2/3 construction of a room. The petitioner and co-accused persons boarded on a motorcycle came and the co-accused Vikas Kumar @ Nepali fired on the informant's uncle which hit in the left panjara and the co-accused Mantu Singh fired on the informant but he saved himself. The petitioner Ajit Singh also started firing with his country made pistol and on halla, the petitioner and the co-accused persons fled away. And the informant's uncle died on the way to the hospital.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The specific allegation of causing fire arm injury is against the co-accused person. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 08.06.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48262 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2022 3/3 satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Bhojpur in connection with Piro P.S. Case No. 280 of 2022.

The application stands allowed.

niku/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T