← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4785/2018disposed

Gaurang Bosak v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-07Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.4785 of 2018 dt.07-05-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4785 of 2018 =========================================================== Gaurang Bosak, son of Chhakaman Bosak, r/o. vill. Bairia, P.S. Baisi, Dist. Purnea .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Purnea

3. Sub-divisional Officer, Baisi, Purnea.

4. District Supply Officer, Purnea.

5. Block Supply Officer, Baisi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. ARVIND UJJWAL- SC4 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 07-05-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for a direction to the learned District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Purnea the appellate authority, to dispose of the Appeal No. 281 of 2017 filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 06.10.2017 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Baisi, Purnea cancelling the PDS licence of the petitioner at an early date in terms of the provisions of Targeted PDS Control Order, 2016.

2. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner and considering that the Supply Appeal against the impugned order of cancellation has already been filed on 30.11.2017, this Court is not inclined to enter into the merits of the matter.

3. The writ petition stands disposed of with a direction to the

Patna High Court CWJC No.4785 of 2018 dt.07-05-2018 concerned appellate authority that the Supply Appeal dated 30.11.2017, said to have been filed against the order of cancellation passed by the Sub Divisional Officer vide memo no. 3528 dated 06.0.2017 (Annexure-1), if pending before him, be considered and disposed of on its own merits after grant of an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously and in any event preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this judgment. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 17.05.2018 Transmission Date NA