← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48456/2022dismissed

Damodar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-04Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48456 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2021 Thana- RAHUI District- Nalanda ====================================================== DAMODAR CHAUDHARY S/o Late Sahdev Chaudhary Resident of Village- Baliya Bigha, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranvijay Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-11-2022 Heard the parties through virtual court proceedings. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Rahui P.S. Case No.334 of 2021, registered for the offence punishable u/s 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegedly 3 litres of country made liquor is said to have been recovered from the house of the petitioner. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has not been apprehended on the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious physical possession. He has been made accused in this case merely on suspicion. He has no concern with the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48456 of 2022(2) dt.04-11-2022 2/2 recovery of the illicit liquor or any trade of liquor. The alleged recovery has been made from joint house of petitioner. There is no compliance of section 100 of the Cr.P.C. Petitioner has two criminal antecedent.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the since the recovery has been made from the house of petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge him on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. This application is accordingly dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T