Chuman Chaurasia v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15823 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -373 Year- 2014 Thana -GOPALGANJ CITY District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Santosh Chourasiya Son of Suresh Chourasiya, Resident of villageSareya Ward No. 1, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.20517 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -373 Year- 2014 Thana -GOPALGANJ CITY District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Chuman Chaurasia son of Suresh Chourasiya, Resident of village- Sareya Ward No. 1, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.15823 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rita Verma (APP) (In Cr.Misc. No.20517 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar No.1(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 08-06-2015 Both the cases are taken together as they arise from the same occurrence.

Heard both sides.

The petitioners seek their bail in Gopalganj Town P.S.Case No.373 of 2014 registered under Section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegations against the petitioners are that they assaulted the informant with knife causing injuries to him.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15823 of 2015 (2) dt.08-06-2015 2/2 It has been submitted that no specific injury has been attributed against the petitioners and only omnibus and general allegations have been made against them. Further, it has been submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent and that the alleged occurrence was taken place on 10.2.2014 but the FIR was instituted on 24.8.2014. No explanation has been given for 14 days delay in instituting the FIR. It is further submitted that the petitioners are in custody since 16.1.2015 and 21.11.2014 respectively.

On behalf of the State it has been stated that the petitioners are named in the FIR.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioners, named above, are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S.Case No.373 of 2014. (Sudhir Singh, J) ahk/- U T