Vicky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48485 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-263 Year-2022 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== VICKY KUMAR Son of Mithilesh Kumar Pandey At present r/v- Keshrawa, P.S- Kudhani, Dist- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Vikram For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-12-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State through video-conferencing. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 307 and 326 A of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, the informant was sleeping in the room which is situated outside the house. At about 1 'O' clock the informant felt some burning sensation and she felt some acid like substance had been poured on her, due to which her waist and right hand were burnt. Thereafter, on halla

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48485 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2022 2/2 her father and brother came and took her to Kudhani P.H.C. for treatment.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that as per the injury report kerosene oil was present on the informant's body and superficial burn injury was found on non-vital parts of the body. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.06.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of detention, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kudhni P.S. Case No. 263 of 2022.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/ayush/- U T