Ugra Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6418 of 2016 =========================================================== Ugra Narayan Yadav S/o Late Sumrit Yadav, 'Up Mukhia', Gram Panchayat Raj - Basuari Resident of village - Basuari, Block - Ghoghardiha, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director ( State Project ), Bihar Madhyamik Shiksha Parishad, Patna

4. The Managing Director, Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Ltd., Shikha Bhawan, Acharya Shivpujan Sahay Path, Saidpur, Patna

5. The Director Director, Regional Education, Darbhanga

6. The District Collector, Madhubani

7. The District Education officer, Madhubani

8. The District Programme officer, Madhubani

9. The Dy. Development Commissioner, Madhubani

10. The Block Education Extension Officer, Ghoghardiha, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani

11. Alola Utkramit Madhya Vidyalaya through its Principal, Village - Alola, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani

12. Sadhusaran Lal Bihari High School through its Principal, Village - Basuari, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani

13. Basuari Utkramit Madhya Vidyalaya through its Principal, village - Basuari, P.S. Ghoghardiha, District - Madhubani .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Madhu Prasun For the Respondent/s : Mr. K. P. Yadav, GP-11 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 08-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The Division Bench had earlier opined that dispute of such kind is not required to be put under judicial scrutiny or the Court is not required to exercise its discretion on such decision. It is best left to the local people and the authorities to examine the

Patna High Court CWJC No.6418 of 2016 dt.08-08-2016 2/2 efficacy of the prayer made in the writ application. Even otherwise, there are many controversial facts, which cannot be decided in a summary proceeding.

Petitioner may pursue the matter with the local authorities, saddled with the power to take such decision in larger public interest.

Writ application stands dismissed with observation / direction as above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) SKM/- AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE Uploading Date 09.08.2016 Transmission Date