Rakesh Raushan @ Rakesh Roshan @ Ray Bahadur Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21005 of 2015 Arising out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2015 Thana -BARHARA District- PURNIA ====================================================== Rakesh Raushan @ Rakesh Roshan @ Ray Bahadur Singh, Son of Goner Prasad Singh, R/o Village - Orlaha,P.S. - Barhara (Raghubanshnagar), District - Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Dr. Bidhu Ranjan, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Smt. Sangita Sharma(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barhara (Raghubanshnagar) P.S. Case No. 25 of 2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 302 and 201/34 of the IPC. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the informant received information that near maize field at Sautari Ghat, dead body of a person is buried in the field. He informed to Incharge O.P. and he alongwith other police officials came and in their presence and with the help of villagers, the said dead body was took out from the said field. The informant disclosed the description of dead body in his fardbeyan and alleged that

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21005 of 2015 (3) dt.04-09-2015 2/2 unknown miscreants committed the murder of the said person and set the dead body on fire, buried the dead body in the field of maize to save their skin for legal punishment. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner's name has come on the basis of confession of coaccused. It is further submitted that there is no eye witness to the occurrence nor there is any circumstantial evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Barhara (Raghubanshnagar) P.S. Case No. 25 of 2015 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Purnea, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T