← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52390/2024bail granted

Roshan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-01Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52390 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2024 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Roshan Kumar S/o Dinanath Prasad R/o Vishambharapur, P.S. - Bhiroganj, Distt. - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Adesh Raj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-08-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sitmarahi Cyber P.S. Case No. 37 of 2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 379, 420 of the IPC and Sections 66(c), 66(e), IT Act.

3. As per prosecution, some unknown persons called on the mobile of the informant numbered as 7765946015 from different four mobile numbers and in the name of offering Sofa, Lahanga, articles of make-up, I-phone, etc, cheated Rs. 4,40,000/- which is said to have been sent by the informant through Pay Phone, Google Pay, Paytm in different accounts.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52390 of 2024(2) dt.01-08-2024 2/2 that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He has further submitted that nothing was recovered from his possession. He has also submitted that the name of the petitioner has come in the FIR only for confessional statement of co-accused Amandeep Raj. The petitioner is a person of clean antecedent and is under custody since 26.04.2024.

5. On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand rupees) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Sitamarhi in connection with Sitamarahi Cyber P.S. Case No. 37 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Nirmal/- U T