Sujit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48299 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2025 Thana- BANMANKHI District- Purnia ====================================================== Sujit Kumar S/O Dayanand Mehta Resident of Village- Kadarganj, Ward No. 8, P.S.- Sarsi, District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-08-2025 Heard Mr. Raj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 111 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of the B.N.S.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the Bolero pickup of the informant was being looted by the petitioner and others.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown miscreants. During the course of investigation, on the basis of confessional statement of one Anshraj, the name of this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48299 of 2025(2) dt.08-08-2025 2/2 petitioner name has been surfaced. He next submits that the car which was being used in the offence was found near the house of the petitioner. The petitioner is not the owner of the said car. He further submits that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 11.04.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of one case.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge IV, Purnea, in connection with Banmankhi P.S. Case No. 111 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T