Pappu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49534 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2024 Thana- CHANAN District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Pappu Yadav S/o Vijay Yadav R/o Village- Manapur Basti, P.S.- Chanan, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Mayank Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-07-2025 Heard Mr.Mayank Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Satya Nand Shukla, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 24.12.2024 in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 124 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 01.11.2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 191(2), 191(3), 352, 351(2), 118(1), 109 and 303(2) of B.N.S.,2023.
3. Allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted to the father-in-law of the informant by means of lathi and he also assaulted to the son of the informant by means of sword.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. It appears from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49534 of 2025(2) dt.18-07-2025 2/3 FIR that due to admitted land dispute the present occurrence had taken place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted to the father-in-law of the informant and son of the informant. Although they have received the injury but the injury report of both the injured persons suggests that the injury is simple in nature and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2024.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid fact, petitioner has clean antecedent, injury inflicted upon both the injured persons is simple in nature and there is admitted land dispute between the parties, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Lakhisarai in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 124 of 2024, with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49534 of 2025(2) dt.18-07-2025 3/3 on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T