← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49053/2025bail granted

Md. Rijwan @ Rijwan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-23Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49053 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-225 Year-2025 Thana- FORBESGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== Md. Rijwan @ Rijwan S/o Md. Kamru R/o Village- Bhawanipur, Ward No. 01, P.S.- Fulkaha, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anish Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 225/2025 dated 08.05.2025 registered for the offence punishable u/ss 8(c) and 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 07 grams of brown sugar (smack), motorcycle and a mobile phone were recovered from the possession of the co-accused, Rabida Khatoon. It is further alleged that the petitioner is involved in the alleged offence with the co-accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49053 of 2025(2) dt.23-07-2025 2/2 this case. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in this case on mere suspicion. The seized contraband is less than commercial quantity. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that a mobile phone was recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S. Case No. 225/2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T