Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.15999 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -325 Year- 2014 Thana -BIRAUL District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== Rakesh Singh @ Rakesh Kumar Singh Son of Raj Kumar Singh Resident of Village - Thathopur, P.S. - Baheri, District - Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bishwanath Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-06-2016 Called for explanation and report have been received. The explanation submitted by the learned court below is hereby accepted.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.
The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 15.10.2015 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 27744 of 2015 on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 17.10.2014 and in near future, the trial is not likely to be concluded which is evident from the report of S.D.J.M., Biraul.
The learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, now the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15999 of 2016 (4) dt.22-06-2016 2/2 petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Biraul, District-Darbhanga in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No. 325 of 2014, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ajaypd./- U T