← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14388/2019disposed

Sushila Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-24Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14388 of 2019 ====================================================== Sushila Devi Wife of Sri Gopal Prasad Keshari Resident of Gurudwara Road, Madhubani Bazar, Police Station- K Hat, District- Purnea. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna- 800015.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna- 800015.

3.

The Director, Land Records and Survey, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna- 800015.

4.

The Land Acquisition Officer, Araria.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sandeep Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (Gp18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 The petitioner is aggrieved by determination of amount of compensation, paid to her against acquisition of land appertaining to Khata No. 27, Thana No. 116, Khesra No. 31, 35 and 36, admeasuring 49 decimal. The land has been acquired under the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

According to the petitioner, though the nature of land is residential, treating the same to be agricultural, the amount of compensation has been determined, which is arbitrary. The petitioner is said to have received the amount of compensation. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner states that

Patna High Court CWJC No.14388 of 2019(3) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 the amount has been received under protest.

In my view, the petitioner has remedy under Section 64 of the Act by making appropriate application before the competent authority.

This application is accordingly disposed of with the only observation that petitioner shall be at liberty to invoke Section 64 of the Act.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Pawan/- U