Sanjay Dubey @ Sanjay Kumar Dubey v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45914 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-9 Year-2025 Thana- NAKARDEI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sanjay Dubey @ Sanjay Kumar Dubey Son of Prem Chandra @ Prem Chand Dubey @ Barababu Dubey Resident of village - Sirisiyamal Birta Tola, Ward No.- 01, P.S.- Nakardai, Nakardei, Dist.- East Champaran, Bihar, Pin - 845301.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anmol Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhuri Lata ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nakardei P.S. Case No. 09 of 2025 dated 11.01.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 111 of the BNS read with Sections 8(c), 21(b) and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 38 grams of brown sugar was recovered from the possession of the co-accused Radheshayam Yadav, 12 gram of brown sugar was recovered from the co-accused Radheshyam Yadav and 44 grams of brown sugar was also recovered from the tool-box of the motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45914 of 2025(2) dt.20-08-2025 2/3 the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case merely on suspicion. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The seized contraband is less than commercial quantity. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated at para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner, who is a lady, is in custody since 20.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, East Champaran in connection with Nakardei P.S. Case No. 09 of 2025, with following condition/s:- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled. (ii). If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45914 of 2025(2) dt.20-08-2025 3/3 move for cancellation of his bail bond.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T