Ghanshyam Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16752 of 2016 (2) dt.04-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16752 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2003 Thana -KHAIRA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Ghanshyam Ravidas Son of Late Bisha Ravidas, Resident of Village - Deepakarhar, P.S. - Khaira, District - Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. A.Haque Sahara (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 58 of 2003 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 364 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Section 302 IPC has also been added, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 16.02.2016 passed in Cri. Misc. No. 4010/16 in the light of the observation made therein that the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

It is submitted that in this case against the accused petitioner charge has already been framed and other co-accused Jehan Ravidas has faced the trial and has already been acquitted.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16752 of 2016 (2) dt.04-05-2016 Further other co-accused Nunvati Devi, the wife of the petitioner was also allowed bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, now the petitioner, above named, is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Jamui in connection with Sessions Trial No. 38 of 2016 arising out of Khaira P.S. Case No. 58 of 2003 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U