← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22141/2015bail granted

Arvind Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

2015-07-16Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22141 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -520 Year- 2012 Thana -MAHUA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Arvind Bhagat Son of Sri Shatrughan Bhagat Resident of village - Paharpur, Maligachhi, P.S. Mahua, District - Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raghwanand For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narayan Kr.(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-07-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under sections 304(B), 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the daughter of the informant was married with co-accused Arvind Bhagat (petitioner) on 6.6.2009 according to Hindu rituals. After marriage she went to her matrimonial house where all the accused persons including the petitioner started to demand motorcycle as a dowry but due to non fulfillment of those demands his daughter was subjected to cruelty in various ways and lastly she was killed by the accused persons.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22141 of 2015 (2) dt.16-07-2015 2/2 that petitioner is in custody since 19.03.2015 and charge sheet has already been submitted in the case. Further attention of this court has been drawn to annexure-3 which is the report of the police inspector wherein he has categorically stated that the deceased had died due to diarrhea . She has been treated in Arti Nursing Home where her condition deteriorated and she was referred to P.M.C.H. but in the way she died.

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M, Vaishali at Hajipur in Mahua P.S. Case No. 520 of 2012.

(Sudhir Singh, J) M.Rahman/- U T