Mokhtar Ansari @ Mokhtar Measoori @ Mukhtar Ansari @ Mukhtar Mansoori v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16491 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -55 Year- 1990 Thana -DIHRINAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. MOKHTAR ANSARI @ MOKHTAR MEASOORI @ MUKHTAR ANSARI @ MUKHTAR MANSOORI Son of Late Abdul Gani Measoori Resident of Village-Hariharganj, Police Station-Nasriganj, District-Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dinesh Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The case was registered in the year 1990 and petititioner was granted bail but due to non co-operation of the petitioner and other accused, even charge could not be framed till the year 2000 and being fed-up with the conduct of the petitioner, the trial court cancelled the bail bonds of the petitioner on 13.08.2002 and issued process against him but petitioner could not be arrested and, accordingly, he was declared absconder on 24.11.2015 and, subsequently, petitioner was arrested and was remanded in the present case.

Considering the conduct of the petitioner as well as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16491 of 2016 (2) dt.26-04-2016 2/2 observations made by the learned 9th Additional Sessions Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and hence, his prayer for bail in connection with Session trial no. 314 of 1991, arising out of Dehri P.S.Case No. 55 of 1990, stands rejected.

However, the learned trial court should expedite the trail of the petitioner and try to conclude the same as early as possible, preferably, within six months, failing which petitioner may renew his prayer for bail before the trail court itself. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T