Munni Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50342 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2024 Thana- GAURICHAK District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Munni Devi W/o Rakesh Kumar R/o vill - Bhedgawan, Post - Jaitiya, P.S. - Gaurichak, Distt. - Patna 2.

Rakesh Kumar S/o Late Sidheshwar Singh R/o vill - Bhedgawan, Post - Jaitiya, P.S. - Gaurichak, Distt. - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhirendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rajendra Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 354, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no. 1 is a woman.

4. The informant alleges that on 28.04.2024 at 03:00 p.m. his co-villager Sidheshwar and Munni Devi (petitioner no. 1) entered his house and started abusing, on protest Rakesh assaulted the informant by an iron rod causing injury on the head thereafter Rakesh dashed his wife on the ground and torn her blouse and Munni abused and assaulted his daughter-in-law and snatched her gold Mangalsutra.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50342 of 2024(4) dt.03-10-2024 2/2

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from side of the petitioners also Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 189 of 2024 has been instituted against the informant and his side. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature as such the petitioners never had any intention of committing a serious occurrence.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, let the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gaurichak P.S. Case No. 188 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T